COMPARE / AGNTID VS IGA
AgntID vs IGA
IGA manages agent identity, ownership, access, and governance across the organization. AgntID adds runtime authorization, evaluating each agent-to-tool action against policy and intent before it runs. Together, policy and intent give security teams control over what an agent is authorized to do, which tools it can access, and under what conditions.
Identity Governance
IGA platform
Who should have access?
Runtime Authorization
AgntID
What should the agent be allowed to do now?
Tool Execution
MCP Tools
Execute the approved action.
The Alternative Options
Do Nothing
Apply existing identity processes to agents - assign ownership, manage access, certify entitlements, and enforce lifecycle controls. It is the easiest path to adopt, but human-centric workflows become difficult to scale and maintain as agent activity grows.
Add IGA-native agent controls
Extend the existing IGA platform with agent discovery, policy enforcement, temporary access, or controls for agent connections and tool use. This keeps governance in one platform, but coverage and policy depth remain constrained by the vendor's model as agent architectures become more distributed.
Combine IGA with adjacent security controls
Pair IGA with PAM, secrets management, API controls, or policy engines to enforce controls across credentials, applications, and agent activity. This can broaden coverage, but it distributes policy and enforcement across multiple systems, increasing integration effort, operational complexity, and maintenance.
Our Difference
Where AgntID differs.
IGA governs who or what has access, who owns that access, and how it is reviewed over time. AgntID applies authorization at runtime, evaluating the specific task, tool, parameters, and policy before an agent action is allowed to proceed.
Runtime policy enforcement
AgntID evaluates each agent-to-tool action when it happens, using task intent, tool scope, parameters, and policy to determine whether the action should be allowed.
Task-scoped credentials
Each tool call can receive credentials narrowed to the specific task and action being performed, reducing the need for agents to operate with broad standing access.
Action-level authorization
AgntID makes the individual agent action the authorization boundary. This gives security teams finer control over what an agent can do, which tools it can use, and under what conditions.
AGNTID VS. EXISTING GOVERNANCE
Grant each agent a governed identity.
Use SailPoint's existing ownership, access review, entitlement, and lifecycle processes to govern agents alongside other identities. This keeps governance centralized, but the control remains focused on standing access and periodic review rather than the specific action an agent is attempting. AgntID adds authorization at the point of execution.
WE ARE BEST FOR TEAMS WHO NEED TO
- Separate agent identity from runtime authority.
- Scope authorization to the task and action.
- Avoid carrying broad permissions across executions.
Identity Governance
Defines identity, ownership, and assigned access.
Fine-Grained Execution Authorization
Narrows access to what each action requires.
Access is governed upfront. AgntID authorizes each action at runtime.
SAILPOINT SERVICE ACCOUNTS
Represents agents with owned identities and permissions.
TASK-LEVEL AUTHORIZATION
Narrows authorization to the task and action.
Identity is governed upfront. AgntID narrows access at runtime.
AGNTID VS. NON-HUMAN IDENTITY CONTROLS
Grant each agent a governed identity.
Represent agents in SailPoint through service accounts or other non-human identity models with assigned ownership, credentials, and permissions. This brings agents under existing identity controls, but access is still defined before the task is known. AgntID narrows authorization once the task, tool, parameters, and target resource are known.
WE ARE BEST FOR TEAMS WHO NEED TO
- Separate agent identity from runtime authority.
- Scope authorization to the task and action.
- Avoid carrying broad permissions across executions.
AGNTID VS. SAILPOINT WITH ADJACENT CONTROLS
Extend SailPoint across the execution stack.
Pair SailPoint with PAM, secrets management, API controls, gateways, or policy engines to enforce additional controls around agent activity. This can broaden coverage, but policy and enforcement become distributed across multiple systems. AgntID adds an authorization boundary around the agent-to-tool action.
WE ARE BEST FOR TEAMS WHO NEED TO
- Evaluate each agent-to-tool action at runtime.
- Reduce policy wiring across multiple enforcement points.
- Tie task context, resource scope, and credentials to each action.
SAILPOINT + ADJACENT CONTROLS
Extends control across credentials, APIs, and policy.
TASK-LEVEL AUTHORIZATION
Narrows authorization to the specific action.
Controls span the stack. AgntID authorizes each action at runtime.
Capability comparison.
IGA governs agent identity, ownership, lifecycle, and standing access. AgntID adds runtime authorization around the individual agent-to-tool action, using task intent and action context to determine what the agent is allowed to do.
| Capability | AgntID | SailPoint |
|---|---|---|
Discovers and inventories agent identities Finds agent identities and brings them into a governed inventory. | Partial | Yes |
Manages agent ownership and lifecycle Assigns ownership and manages agent identities through established lifecycle processes. | No | Yes |
Reviews and certifies agent access. Reviews whether agents should retain assigned access and permissions over time. | No | Yes |
Governs standing access to resources Determines which systems, applications, and resources an agent is permitted to access. | Partial | Yes |
Authorizes each action against task intent Determines whether each agent-to-tool action is authorized for the task the agent is trying to complete. | Yes | Partial |
Enforces authorization at runtime Enforces the authorization decision at the point where the agent attempts the action. | Yes | Partial |
Limits credentials to the approved action Issues or constrains credentials to the access required for the approved action, reducing reliance on broad standing permissions. | Yes | Partial |
Records an audit trail for each action Records the authorization decision and action context for each agent-to-tool call. | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions.
THE ASK
Request design partner access.
Tell us where your agents are today. We'll follow up to scope a pilot and walk through what changes in your stack.